Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Hazing


Most people desire acceptance. Students are no exception, especially when they are new on campus. When acceptance into a group requires some form of “initiation” that humiliates, degrades, or risks emotional or physical harm, the group has engaged in hazing. 

The subject of hazing has recently gained national media attention following the death of Robert Champion—a drum major in Florida A&M’s high-profile marching band The Marching 100. According to university officials, Champion was punched repeatedly by a small group of band members on a bus following a football game. According to Fox News, he suffered blunt trauma blows to his body and died from shock caused by severe bleeding. Authorities suspect that the attack was part of hazing ritual.

The Marching 100 is internationally recognized and has performed at numerous prestigious events like presidential inaugurations, the Grammy Awards, and five Super Bowls. At Florida A&M, the popularity of the band exceeded that of its football team. Band members are treated like celebrities; however, celebrity status did not come easy. There is evidence to suggest that hazing incidents, such as the attack on Champion, was a part of the band’s subculture for decades. Unfortunately, Champion’s death was not the first serious hazing incident at the university.

The notion that acceptance into a group would be based on enduring violent physical attacks by peers is disturbing. Nevertheless, students seeking acceptance into certain groups often voluntarily subject themselves to hazing, while existing members readily participate in acts that put new members in danger. It could be that students do not fully appreciate the gravity of hazing. Many see hazing as just harmless pranks. Others view hazing as a rite of passage or a time-honored tradition that must be continued. However, in most states hazing is illegal and students who haze could be prosecuted and sent to jail. 

When hazing is assessed in the context of civility, one must determine whether the practice promotes mutual respect and dignity? Is the community strengthened when existing members use a power differential to coerce others to engage in dangerous activities?  I believe the answer to these questions is no. Furthermore, there may be intense social pressure not to report hazing incidents. No one likes a snitch. However, when the health and safety of another is in jeopardy, reporting could possibly save a life.